Vlada je državni prostorski načrt za prvi del južnega dela tretje razvojne osi z uredbo res sprejela leta 2012, toda državni prostorski načrti niso pravnomočni, spremeniti ali razveljaviti jih je mogoče z uspešnim upravnim sporom.
Pobudo za spremembo državnega prostorskega načrta po zakonu o urejanju prostora lahko vloži pristojno ministrstvo. Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo, ki je pristojno za to področje, je za Razkrinkavanje.si sporočilo, da sprememb državnega prostorskega načrta ne načrtujejo.
Trditev portala, da je bil državni prostorski načrt za cesto od avtoceste A2 pri Novem mestu do Malin leta 2012 sprejet pravnomočno, zato ni nikakršnih možnosti za njegovo spremembo, ne drži.

– SAMO DEMŠAR, OŠTRO.SI o gradnji južnega dela tretje razvojne osi, ki bo povezoval Novo mesto in slovensko-hrvaško mejo
Advertisement

Which should you deliver first: the good news or the bad news?

The best endings don’t leave us happy. Instead, they produce something richer — a rush of unexpected insight, a fleeting moment of transcendence, the possibility that by discarding what we wanted, we’ve gotten what we need. Endings offer good news and bad news about our behavior and judgment. I’ll give you the bad news first, of course — endings help us encode a lesson learned, but they can sometimes twist our memory and cloud our perception by overweighting final moments and neglecting the totality.

But endings can also be a positive force. They can help energize us to reach a goal. They can help us edit the nonessential from our lives. And they can help us elevate — not through the simple pursuit of happiness but through the more complex power of poignancy. Closings, conclusions and culminations reveal something essential about the human condition: In the end, we seek meaning.

Dan Pink, ideas.ted.com (Which should you deliver first: the good news or the bad news?, 23. januar 2018)

The End of Globalization

The 2016 U.S. presidential elections triggered emotions I had not felt for years. In 1998, Venezuela, where I’m from, elected a populist president who, like U.S. President Donald Trump, ran a campaign based on anti-establishment sentiments. Countries like Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, and Nicaragua followed suit, and I began to wonder about the extent to which the benefits of neo-liberalism were really reaching the general population. Systematic research on the possible “end of globalization” was not taken seriously, at least not by many of the Western drivers of today’s political-economic order. But now Brexit in the UK and Trump have shaken faith in the conventional wisdom and have many asking, “Is this the end?”

Rebecca Van Roy, študentka LSE (A Student Perspective on a Global Network Course on Globalization — LSE Management, 6. maj 2017)